Which of the following actions best aligns with the FAME program's recommended approach to building assessment capacity in a team?

Which of the following actions best aligns with the FAME program's recommended approach to building assessment capacity in a team?

• A. Train a designated FAME Coach.
• B. Use the same old assessment methods.
• C. Hire external consultants.
• D. Have all teachers become coaches.

Answer: (B)

Building assessment capacity is most effective when a team grows together around the tools and methods they already use. Using the same old assessment methods lets everyone operate with a common, trusted foundation. Data from these familiar tools remains consistent over time, so the team can accurately track progress, identify learning gaps, and decide on targeted improvements. Because the methods are already known, teachers spend less time learning new systems and more time focusing on how to interpret results, discuss findings, and act on them to raise student outcomes. This stability also helps reduce resistance and build collective confidence, which is crucial for sustainable change. Other approaches—like pulling in a single designated coach, bringing in external consultants, or expecting every teacher to become a coach—tend to shift the burden away from the team’s shared practice and can create dependencies or unrealistic expectations. By strengthening and expanding use of what’s already in place, the team builds true, scalable capacity that can be maintained and refined over time.

Building assessment capacity is most effective when a team grows together around the tools and methods they already use. Using the same old assessment methods lets everyone operate with a common, trusted foundation. Data from these familiar tools remains consistent over time, so the team can accurately track progress, identify learning gaps, and decide on targeted improvements. Because the methods are already known, teachers spend less time learning new systems and more time focusing on how to interpret results, discuss findings, and act on them to raise student outcomes. This stability also helps reduce resistance and build collective confidence, which is crucial for sustainable change.

Other approaches—like pulling in a single designated coach, bringing in external consultants, or expecting every teacher to become a coach—tend to shift the burden away from the team’s shared practice and can create dependencies or unrealistic expectations. By strengthening and expanding use of what’s already in place, the team builds true, scalable capacity that can be maintained and refined over time.